-
Re: Which is the most effective naming convention for optical sizes?
John’s advice looks solid to me—and Cesare is right about potential name conflict issues. You can’t (or at least, shouldn’t) have two different fonts which are identical for both name IDs 1 and 2.1 -
Re: Which is the most effective naming convention for optical sizes?
That’s right. The optical size work is on a different project. I considered optical size for Science Gothic, but that would have been five axes and my head would have exploded. That terminology and …1 -
Re: PS or TT? (aka cubic vs quadratic Bézier curves, or *.otf vs *.ttf)
> (I could see how using delta hints would be more useful when there are more nodes available to shift). I don't see how that matters at all, actually. The curve type and the hinting models a…2 -
Re: Which is the most effective naming convention for optical sizes?
If you want to have that many optical sizes, and you feel a need to have labels, numeric labels make sense. In a current project, for masters we are using S(mall) M(edium) L(arge) XL (ExtraLarge), bu…2 -
Re: Variable height axis font
There are a variety of validation and checking tools out there. Font bakery is one I use daily integrated into the build process. Partly because I am doing work for Google, but regular testing is a g…1
